Part 3 – The History of Conflicts

Victory by singing the audacity of our battles.

The summer of 2026 and its succession of heatwaves since May marks a crucial period between the old world at the end of its breath and the occurrence of a new but which displays its presence and the announcement of new destruction at all levels of human activity: political, economic, social, cultural. What is to come is thus worse than expected and above all unsustainable for the majority of citizens.

Yet responsibility for these infamous policies and strategies rests with a few thousand financial policymakers and politicians fanatical about criminal supremacist religious dogmas. Their world government, their new world of the 2030 Agenda, wants only to destroy the old world that they could not govern and destroy according to their senseless ideology and for the greatest glory of their god invented from scratch to serve their sinister evil interests.

This succession of defeats against this fanatical ruling minority, including always the strange defeat of 1940 analyzed by the historian Marc Bloch entered the Pantheon in this month of June, by a happy coincidence is contradicted by the reminder, on the big screen of cinema, of the terrible and finally victorious fights of the Free French Forces which brought together the armies which refused the capitulation of 1940 with Vichy and the movements of Resistance unified finally in the National Council of the Resistance then the Provisional Government of Free France.

Each time France has found women and men to get out of its ruts, its delays, its partisan conflicts. Once again, we need a new epic to find ourselves in a Free France, definitely free.

In January 2011, in the poet’s speech at Les Glières, we showed that the authors responsible for the Second World War were not going to return because they simply had not left. It is the same for centuries if not 2,500 years and the destruction of the last flourishing millennial civilization in the West that are acting to destroy us. We now know how they are constantly enriching themselves by financing wars that bring them miraculous profits impossible in peacetime while destroying our human societies little by little.

We are ready to continue the battles of our elders and the Free French Forces, until the final battle defined by Honoré de Balzac. He did not give the characteristics and strategy of this final battle for us to be the victors. Today we know how to win it.

We will boldly fight these battles to live free without autocratic systems of power and theocracies.

Let’s start by returning in 1945 to the victory of the Free French Forces and to this film of June 2026 which transmits to us the powerful and invigorating breath of these women and men, this liberating breath that was able to change our history.

The Battle of Gaulle

« We live in a narrative written by the Americans, but this is not our story »

Document: Excerpt from the program “Un monde, un regard”

Antonin Baudry is the guest of Rebecca Fitoussi in “Un monde, un regard” this week. In his last two films « The Battle of Gaulle », he has been interested in the emblematic figure of General de Gaulle, and the history of the Second World War and the liberation. According to him and since the arrival of the American « boys », France and Europe live under the influence of an American narrative.

End of document.

Antonin Baudry explains the Americans

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1440048874807253

« This is something that has never been told in the cinema. » That’s our story. The first ones who showed they didn’t want German occupiers were kids from Paris.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1CuBLAvAVM/

Antonin Baudry is the hope that interests me most in the character of de Gaulle.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19PnoZwGVU/

Famous phrases from the film La Bataille De Gaulle :

source: FB Pathé Films 11 July 2026 at 6 pm

Dialogs between Charles de Gaulle and Winston Churchill

scene 1: Winston’s clothes

W: You are a clever, you are deceiving your world with your old housekeeper look.

Ch: I didn’t know it was carnival day.

W: That? Not everyone dresses like the Unknown Soldier.

Scene 2: the dispute over who represents France.

Ch: You’re ending the alliance between France and England?

W: Between De Gaulle and England.

Ch: Why discuss with De Gaulle if he is not France?

W: You are not France!

Scene 3: De Gaulle and the English general.

Ch: De Gaulle only obeys France.

G: Avoid at least mosquitoes.

Ch: Mosquitoes don’t bite General De Gaulle.

Scene 4: De Gaulle in 1940 leads his beloved to Montcornet.

His driver: We lost, the gang fled.!

Ch: Do I look like I’m running away ?

source: FB Pathé Films 11 July 2026 at 6 pm

How de Gaulle continues his victorious march in cinema.

The crazy project of French cinema.

« Don’t confuse it with the 2020 film! The historic fresco The Battle of Gaulle by Antonin Baudry (The Wolf’s Song) stands out as one of the most ambitious shoots in the history of European cinema:

6 years of work and 150 days of shooting: A diptych for more than 75 million euros shot between France and the desert of Morocco (to reconstruct the battle of Bir Hakeim).

XXL logistics: Entire districts of Paris closed to the public, thousands of extras and dozens of restored military vehicles.

1h40 of daily makeup: An impressive physical metamorphosis for Simon Abkarian thanks to the fitting of facial prostheses every morning.

3D Scan Technology: Using 3D LIDAR scans to model period scenery and generate crowds and digital bombardments.

An extraordinary project that shows all the ambition of French cinema! »

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1bkdfgk8n6/

Boosted by an exceptional word of mouth, the film has all summer to last.

M.A.J of 30/07/2026: The diptych The Battle of Gaulle exceeds 4 million admissions.

M.A.J of 16/07/2026:

« The other great performance of the week is to be credited to La Bataille de Gaulle, which now looks great by crossing the milestone of 3 million admissions. The historic diptych thus confirms its status as a great popular French hit, with about 1 million spectators for J’écris ton nom and 2 million for L’Age de fer. »

https://www.premiere.fr/Cinema/News-Cinema/Vaiana-en-live-prend-la-tete-du-box-office-francais-mais

Document: Le Point, extracts

Boosted by an exceptional word of mouth, Antonin Baudry’s diptych continues to earn admissions and bets on the summer to last.

The miracle took place in the third week (17 to 23 June) with an increase in admissions of 17%: the excellent word of mouth, the good reviews and the heatwave quickly triggered a real surge, in line with the political news, at a time when there is talk of resistance, sacrifice and the French are desperately looking for the providential man of 2027.

This turnaround, he explains “by the excellent word of mouth on this second part, better, on what I see, than the first. I’ve heard reactions from the public saying, « Go to the second one, it’s even better than the first one. » We have a machine that has started and is quite impressive. It should allow both films to have a long career afterwards, on television, streaming, dvd.”

some comments on Le Point Facebook

Publication 07/07/2026 10:30 pm

C. D.

Go ahead! The 1st is very successful. The 2nd is so breathtaking that everyone wants to applaud. We all dream of a president who would have this stuff, inspired heroes who would give everything for their country, greatness, height of sight, values

A. G.

Fascinating historical fresco, excellent actors, big means: it’s good and real cinema, it’s French in addition, and so much more exciting than the umpteenth sequel of a big American franchise!

E.P.

Exceptional film about an exceptional man, an example for all especially for politicians who are unfortunately far from this hero General de Gaulle.

B. B.

Some minions of nothing have denigrated it undoubtedly too French to their taste it is OUR STORY and it is magnificent 2 films to broadcast in schools because better than a history manual BRAVO to all the actors and the director.

F.M.

Looking at both, we follow De Gaulle’s entire journey during the war, which gives a more complete view of this period of French history.

J. L.

Remarkable film, we did not finish defeating to losing magnificent, but exceptional triumphant of freedom on the territorial and moral level thanks to the fighters of the Great Free France and those who helped them. We find this spirit that holds the power to change the world.

source

https://www.lepoint.fr/culture/comment-de-gaulle-poursuit-sa-marche-victorieuse-au-cinema-WHESGB3BXNBYZKUDVG5XUOZ3PQ/?at_variante=Community%20Management

Other testimony:

« Dear General de Gaulle, I want to apologize today for throwing cobblestones in May 68…» @annette_levy_willard after seeing The Battle of Gaulle

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1520772239850594

Undefeated Free French Forces!

Our reading after seeing the two parts of the film and leaving the cinema all invigorated to lead the fight towards a new civilization without autocratic systems of power and without Theocracies with their criminal religious dogmas.

The contrast between these two parts of the film is striking and it corresponds to the historical events of the Second World War and the battles fought by France until the victory of May 1945.

Part 1 films a single man

full of his certainties and surrounded by petty, cowardly and treacherous people and very few french who refuse the defeat of 1940.

It is very difficult to describe this loneliness in books. The cinema, the image and the sound, in this film has succeeded this prodigy with an actor embodied in his story who manages to express these feelings certainly of doubt and dismay but also his unshakable conviction that the people in both parts will keep in this only fateful but very truthful word: undefeated!

The first to demonstrate against the occupier were the high school students, the kids of Paris, on November 11, 1940 at the Arc de Triomphe. This is the starting point in the film of the history of the Resistance of Free France.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1D5fpmYEAn/

Part 1 ends with the Battle of Bir Hakeim.

Excerpts from the film The Battle of de Gaulle, Part 1: https://fb.watch/IF_KAVXLlO

In Bir-Hakeim, Koenig’s wife who drives during the exit to the English lines, I had already imagined her when reading a book about this battle of Free France. Seeing her on the big screen driving this way to the English lines is breathtaking, not a shock but confirmation that it is possible since she did it! It is up to us to remember that in such desperate circumstances, it is possible and that boldly, we can do it again!

susan travers

Part 2 is more positive and catchy.

The conviction of the great loner officially called insane and unmanageable is finally shared by the Free French community and it is clearly expressed in front of the leaders of this world supposedly called the Allies.It is the victories of the soldiers of Free France that will push the movements of Resistance to unite and this National Council of Resistance will strengthen the ardor of the fighters in France and among the undefeated Free French Forces.

The two communities of soldiers and resistance fighters eventually helped each other found the provisional government of France that Roosevelt would later accept. Churchill, for more prosaic reasons, would convince Eisenhower that without the resistance, that is, the Gaullists, his landing would be a crushing failure. Reason will eventually prevail until the liberation of Paris.

The conflict of interest between the two Saint-Cyriens de Gaulle and Giraud will be in a way mediated by another former student of their school, the Gaullist of the first hour Leclerc who with his victories, his audacity and the exceptional conduct of his troops, will bring the first key to the recognition of the Free French after the heroic resistance of the Free French of Koenig to Bir-Hakeim.

The Battle of Ksar Rhilane (Tunisia, March 1943) marked the very first battle of the L Force (future 2nd DB) directly against the German army, and more particularly against the formidable units of Field Marshal Rommel’s Afrika Korps.

Leclerc harangues his officers before the fight:

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17eczZzgzD/

In the film, the staging puts us at the heart of the battle behind Leclerc, released major in 1925 of the Cavalry Application School of Saumur where he asserts himself not by his equestrian talents but by his « character », his « intelligence », his « judgment »: he « has in him the stuff of an officer of the greatest value. »

In 1938, he joined the Ecole Supérieure de Guerre (ESG) as a major. In 1939, at the mobilization, it retains its ranking.

On the ground, facing the German tanks advancing towards him and his troops, everyone knows that with their weapons, they have to wait until these tanks are very close before opening fire. But Leclerc’s cane still doesn’t come down. Boldly, he waits for the last moment, the moment when only close combat will allow them to effectively resist enemy armor.

Then the staging puts us in the cockpit of an English fighter jet. Montgomery doesn’t forget it. Like the pilot, we discover the incredible: Leclerc followed by his troop begins the hunt behind the German tanks fleeing the fight. When they run out of gas, they just have to be picked… By examining the books and documents on Leclerc, we better understand this warrior.

« In 1933, while he was an instructor at Saint Cyr, Hauteclocque joined Giraud in Morocco under more or less regular conditions, but with the agreement of the commander of the School, General Frère. In the Aghbalou massif, at the head of a group of supporters on foot, he ends the campaign with a decisive attack carried out laterally and not frontally. A second palm is added to his war cross; which is rare but not exceptional. His superiors, passing over his shoulders, raise his thoughtful and resolute way of mounting and conducting an action. »

The second key will be provided by Jean Moulin who will succeed in setting up the National Council of the Resistance.

It was in the face of this popular will of citizens that Giraud agreed to step aside from his political role.

It was in the face of this popular will of citizens that Giraud agreed to step aside from his political role.

The resistance in this film is carried by a Parisian resistance fighter of November 1940 who will become the secretary of Jean Moulin and then participate in the liberation of Paris.

movie trailer: https://youtu.be/-5XwuIl5sPg

Following the phenomenal success of this film, the testimonies about the Resistance resurface with characters as fierce in their hope of freedom as the actors of the film.

For example, Paulette Jacquier born July 18, 1918 in La Frette, the Joan of Arc of the 1st DFL.

« From then on, she will fight, a true maverick, in the Chambaran maquis. The young woman plays undercover, informs. On August 18, she fought in an ambush. Four days later, in Lyon, it seized the plans to defend the bridges over the Rhône. On the 26th, she was in charge of smuggling American agents across the lines. « Marie-Jeanne » is on the ranks as FFI of the battalion Chambaran, in brand new US outfit, in Lyon liberated, on September 14, to receive the legion of honor, from the hands of General de Gaulle, no one notices her long hair more or less hidden, in the middle of boys out of adolescence, that she is a woman. From then on, corporal in the 4th « Chambaran » marching battalion of the DFL, she will fight like a man, among men. »

Paulette Jacquier née le 18 juillet 1918 à La Frette, la Jeanne d’Arc de la 1ère DFL

« Marie-Jeanne » is on the ranks as FFI of the battalion Chambaran, in Lyon liberated, on September 14, to receive the legion of honor, from the hands of General de Gaulle.

Paulette Jacquier, the Joan of Arc of the 1st DFl, will join in this division of Free France, Susan Travers, the only woman engaged in the Foreign Legion. The resistance fighter from the unification of the Resistance movements led by Jean Moulin joined the Free French Forces of Koenig and Leclerc created by General de Gaulle. The two forces of Free France after the Liberation of Paris unite to lead the fight to victory.

We do not forget here our neighbor, the widow of Lieutenant FFI massacred on August 16, 1944 at the Bois de Boulogne waterfall in Paris.

When victory became clear for the allies, the fate of French independence was thwarted by American and English plans.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/964472536464449

hey’re not just soldiers, they’re warriors,

those who defend the widow and the orphan, all the oppressed of the Earth as defined by Sitting Bull. The warrior carries a peace solution to stop the war. This foolish project of the provisional government of France, without American Amgot, will irrevocably seal their commitments as Undefeated Free Frenchmen!

The film cannot tell everything, so read the story, the biographies of these exceptional warriors.

De Gaulle is linked to Pétain, his superior at the beginning of his career and Pétain is the godfather of one of his children. But they’re gonna get permanently confused. Colonel de Gaulle in 1939 was part of the staff of the 5th Army installed in Wangenbourg in Alsace and he met General de Lattre de Tassigny, who heads this staff.

The meeting between Giraud and Leclerc is one of the key moments of the film: Leclerc, grateful to the officer who trained him and Giraud the master in front of his student whom he calls by his first name and who knows that he will surpass him in military glory, shows once again that behind these soldiers gathered in this immense fight against Nazism, there are above all men in love with Freedom. But the beginnings were difficult between these two warriors. « It all began in Gabès, on April 2, 1943, with a tense interview with Giraud who believed he was bringing the « little Hauteclocque » back under his orders. Leclerc, in return, advised him to recognize de Gaulle. During the victory parade in Tunis, the Free French, refusing to march with the African Army, take their place at the head of the 8th British Army. »

General Aubert Frère was the superior of de Gaulle in 1940. He remained in Vichy, he will preside over the Court of Appeal to punish De Gaulle more severely. There will be two judges voting against the death penalty in absentia, him and another general. He took over the leadership of the Army Resistance Organization (ORA) in December 1942, after the invasion of the southern zone, of which he took command. Arrested, he was deported to the Struthof camp near Strasbourg, where he was military governor in 1939. « He died of exhaustion there on June 13, 1944, murdered slowly and cruelly. When he died, he said to a warrant officer, « You’ll go out. Go find General de Gaulle and tell him that at the 1940 war council there were two of us who voted against death, including me. »

General de Lattre and Leclerc will not agree as they are so different.

« The Americans covered the ridge of the Vosges but did not immediately follow. Leclerc could not seize the Kehl Bridge or push too far south. Can we blame de Lattre for not having tried the junction, thus allowing the pocket of Colmar to be created? An army commander subjected to harsh logistical and tactical realities does not react like a divisional. It is true that de Lattre does not seem to have made the best use of his two armored divisions, the lre and the 5th, whose chiefs, Touzet du Vigier and especially Vernejoul did not hide their bitterness.

Was the glory of the liberation of Strasbourg due to the liberator of Paris or to the commander of the Free Army? The tension between the flamboyant youngest of Gascony and the austere Picardy gentleman probably finds there his first explanation. There are others. Leclerc, citing greater efficiency and the specificity of the 2nd DB, has refused since September to integrate into the Lre Armée française and has made this known. This behavior is always highly criticized. In addition, elements of its division, which were placed at the disposal of the 2nd Army Corps, were engaged head-on and suffered heavy casualties.

At the end of the Battle of Alsace with the liberation of Colmar, « on February 1, 1945, a stormy interview between de Lattre and Leclerc ended with a tête-à-tête from which nothing transpired. »

We can imagine that Leclerc, an expert in combat with his armored vehicles, taught the leader of the 1st French Army a hard lesson.

Touzet du Vigier in 1943 commanded the 1st DB in the Army of Africa and he participated in the establishment of the 2nd DB of Leclerc. How did de Lattre not engage Touzet’s tanks immediately in the Trouée de Belfort during the first part of the offensive instead of wasting time in fighting in the Vosges towards the Tholy? From September 15 to 20, the two Corps of the First French Army gather in front of the Belfort gap, the gate of Alsace. On October 17 at noon, de Lattre stops the offensive of the Vosges.

Lui Leclerc crossed the Vosges du Nord in 6 days, from November 17 to November 22. On November 23, 1944, the entire 2nd DB crossed the crest of the Vosges by Dabo. It surprises the enemy by opening on its rear in the plain of Alsace. Leclerc entrusted the maneuver to his fellow Saint-Cyr promoter, Marc Rouvillois. In 1936, Rouvillois then commanded a motorcycle squadron of the 3rd Hussar Regiment in Wissembourg. He knows the region well and decides on the way forward with the help of the Alsatian FFI. In one day, on November 23, he is the first to enter Strasbourg.

« De Lattre, when he had to act quickly and boldly to seize the Neuf-Brisach bridge, the umbilical cordon of any German maneuver on the left bank of the Rhine in Alsace, de Lattre would procrastinate, arguing the fatigue of his troops, especially his infantry. The Rhine was reached on the 21st evening by a detachment of a sub-group of the 1st DB, the first Allied unit to border the river. The next day, Mulhouse falls, but the Germans continue to hold the Hardt forest. To give himself air, de Lattre engages the 5th DB commanded by the general of Vernejoul in the direction of Dannemarie and Thann, which causes a memorable traffic jam between the columns of the two armored divisions whose routes are shearing.

De Lattre only reasoned in terms of infantry maneuvers. While he had three armored divisions under his command, he never imagined the constitution of a temporary armored corps grouping them to concentrate his efforts on Neuf-Brisach, both from the north (2nd DB), the south (1st DB) and the west (5th DB). The range of such a maneuver would have been between 30 and 50 kilometers. The opportunity passed in the early days of December. » Yes Leclerc had enough to give a severe lesson to de Lattre, unable to use his armored vehicles to break through the enemy lines at the end of November 1944 in the south of Alsace.

Yet in April 1945, de Lattre applied the lessons of Leclerc in the Battle of Stuttgart and Württemberg.

« Without notifying the American General Staff, De Lattre ordered General Bethouart’s 1st Army Corps to sink through the mountains under the snow. The M4 Sherman armored vehicles of the 5th Armored Division and the infantry of the 9th Colonial Infantry Division set off on steep roads deemed impractical for tanks. By capturing the flashpoint town of Freudenstadt on April 16, 1945, French troops split the German lines in half and presented the Allied command with a fait accompli.

​This lightning breakthrough allows De Lattre to execute a masterful tactical maneuver: the operation of the “Node Coulant”. While the 19th German Army (including the terrifying 18th. SS-Armeekorps) awaits the French army from the front along the Rhine, the 5th DB pivots due south towards the Swiss border. On 22 April, the French horsemen reached Lake Constance in Überlingen, closing a gigantic trap on more than 30,000 enemy soldiers trapped in the massif

en avril 1945, de Lattre va appliquer les leçons de Leclerc dans la bataille de Stuttgart et du Wurtemberg

This film has a burning topicality and brings back a breathtaking hope of Freedom. The project is no longer a provisional government but the establishment of a new flourishing civilization like that of the medieval period, the last in Europe.

The last warlord in France took up arms to defend this functioning of a flourishing civilization and the time of the cathedrals in Europe was burned by the English, the Anglo-Saxons.

Charles de Gaulle remembered it and said it to explain Churchill’s attitude towards him… always those Englishmen!

The whole film with its 2 parts is constructed in this way with finesse, coherence and accuracy in the smallest details.

Congratulations to those who participated in the realization of this monument of French cinema, free, bold, captivating and … undefeated!

Understanding history to surpass it and create a new one, De Gaulle knew how to make… and this film too!

The final assessment of the French division before its embarkation at the end of July 1944 is unequivocal.

In the shadow of the command of the 3rd Army, the final assessment of the French division before its embarkation at the end of July 1944 is unequivocal. While the French style of command is sometimes considered unorthodox by Pentagon bureaucrats, Patton and Haislip acknowledge in their personal and operational notes that the 2nd DB possesses a rare quality: offensive aggressiveness and unfailing morale. The American archives thus seal the destiny of the division, not as a backup force, but as a first-rank shock unit, ready to be projected into the fury of the Normandy countryside.

#2eDB#DivisionLeclerc#ww2#second worldwar#generalpatton#generaleclerc#generalhaislip

The landing of the 2nd DB of Leclerc on August 1, 1944

Restored Archives: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1M9rzs3kQy/

Armored Division landing: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1113066371046419

In these precious period images, General Leclerc is heard receiving his instructions from an American officer, announcing that his units will have to move as soon as night falls. A striking sequence that perfectly illustrates the urgency and strategic intensity of the moment.

An anecdote about the victory parade in 1945 for the 2nd DB.

‘May 1945. Germany has just capitulated. In Berchtesgaden, a symbolic place of Nazism (near Hitler’s eagle’s nest), the troops of General Leclerc’s 2nd Armored Division are lined up in impeccable formation for the great Victory parade in the presence of General de Gaulle.

Suddenly, while everyone is at attention, Marlène Dietrich emerges. The Hollywood star, who followed her lover Jean Gabin on the front during the war, climbs without hesitation on the military tank of his companion and kisses him fiercely, passionately, in front of the whole division! Jean Gabin, a rigorous, modest and disciplined soldier, is mortified. He reportedly whispered, « But Marlene, not here! » while the soldiers, amused and admiring, applaud this spectacular kiss in the middle of the war zone. The scene, worthy of a Hollywood film, instantly becomes legendary.

Marlène Dietrich, engaged alongside the Allies, had crossed the Atlantic, sung for American and French troops, and risked her life to support the war effort. His torrid relationship with Jean Gabin began in Hollywood in 1941. Despite the age difference and their opposing characters (she extroverted and flamboyant, reserved and earthy), their passion was intense and lasted several years.

This public kiss in full military parade perfectly symbolizes their crazy and free love in time of war. It remains one of the most romantic and cinematic images in the history of the mythical couple Gabin-Dietrich. Years later, this anecdote continues to make us dream: an international star who does not hesitate to climb on a tank to kiss his French soldier in front of General de Gaulle and thousands of soldiers. A moment of humanity and passion in the middle of history. »

#JeanGabin#MarleneDietrich#Kiss1945#Berchtesgaden#DivisionLeclerc#GeneralDeGaulle#WorldWarII#MythicalCouple#WarLove#HollywoodFrench#PassionTorrid#HistoryOfOnePassion

As with all wars, veterans of the Second World War, towards the end of their lives, are forced to acknowledge that they fought for nothing. From war to war, the world doesn’t improve; it gets worse! Those who organize and finance wars continue their crimes.
Le sacrifice n'en valait pas la peine, vu ce qu'est devenu le pays. Nous sommes plus mal lotis qu'à l'époque où j'ai combattu pour le pays. Alec Penstone, vétéran britannique de la seconde guerre mondiale.

The sacrifice wasn’t worth it, given what the country has become. We are worse off than when I fought for our country. Alec Penstone, British Second World War veteran.

In The Management of the Second World War by the bankers, we discuss the Normandy campaign of the 2nd DB of Leclerc and the management of this battle by the Americans and the English.

https://fileane.com/fr/reseaux-de-vie/partie-05-abandon-des-systemes-de-pouvoirs/le-management-de-la-seconde-guerre-mondiale-par-les-banquiers/

In The Security and Defense of Our Networks of Life, we follow this audacity of the warriors to the Peace Treaty and the war to impose it not against the peoples but against the few thousand rulers, big and small tyrants who subjugate these peoples.

https://fileane.com/fr/reseaux-de-vie/partie-01-les-institutions-des-reseaux-de-vie/la-securite-et-la-defense-des-reseaux-de-vie/

At the end of this chapter, we present the final battle against these warlords.

The war in Algeria and De Gaulle

This film also awakened the anti de Gaulle and certainly also the anti FFL and anti CNR and Provisional Government of France. We cite this example of a visibly pro-American FB site and everything is satisfied to be able to tarnish the image of the General so well highlighted in this film.

Franco against De Gaulle

Publication of Good morning army

FB 30/06/2026 to 09: 33

This is 1962. The world is experiencing one of the most tragic and forgotten exoduses in its history: the Blackfoot exodus.

In the ports, thousands are waiting in the crushing heat, with fear in their stomachs. Thousands of women, children and families are hoping for repatriation.

For a terrible slogan then echoes: « The suitcase or the coffin. »

Faced with this human distress, an initiative as unexpected as it is decisive is born. General Franco, who witnessed this tragedy, wishes to speak. But the French government is reluctant.

In order to dock on the quays of Oran, Spanish ships must obtain the agreement of the French authorities.

Spain then issued an ultimatum and threatened France with a diplomatic incident.

On 30 June 1962, at 10 a.m., despite the opposition of General de Gaulle, two ferries left Spain for Oran. Franco says he is ready to go as far as the military confrontation to save these defenseless men, women and children, abandoned on the quays of Oran and threatened with execution at any time by the FLN.

He ordered his navy to proceed immediately to Oran.

Finally, faced with the determination of General Franco and fearing an armed conflict, General de Gaulle gave in. On Saturday, 30 June, at 1 p.m., two Spanish ferries dock and carry 2,200 passengers.

General Franco then ordered his captains to embark on this « human misery ». The captains will then describe the extreme tension between them and the French authorities.

Against all odds, at 3:30 p.m., the quays of Oran, crowded a few hours earlier, finally begin to empty. The Spanish ships set sail, despite a significant overload, towards the port of Alicante.

Throughout the crossing, tears of distress, sorrow, but also relief and joy mingle. These men, women and children are heading for a new exile, aware that they have escaped the worst.

https://www.facebook.com/GoodmArmy

Our comment in response

Algeria had to become a sovereign state with those who had developed the economy of this magnificent country. My father was a soldier there. For him the only fault was committed by the great French settlers and their stupidity. But the small settlers paid for their loss.

Yet this had already happened in Indochina. To recover their belongings as soon as possible, the great settlers there brought in a first contingent of French soldiers in which German prisoners of war, including SS, were numerous.

A resistance fighter from Haute-Savoie who had fought in the Glières maquis in the Liberté Chérie section in Lavouillon, says in his book that it was these SS who committed the worst abuses against the local population to the point of turning it in favor of the Viet Minh and against the French. For him this reversal is the beginning of the loss of this country for us French. The great settlers were the first responsible, as later in Algeria.

Did De Gaulle want to leave this terrible responsibility to the great settlers and refuse to take it on?

The Algerian leaders trained and supported by Moscow had gone to seek help from Soviets led by the Ashkenazi Zionists who in March 1953 had assassinated Stalin after the white coat plot in January 1953 for which he wanted to condemn to death doctors predominantly Jewish. Stalin wanted to complete his rule by eliminating this deadly threat from the Zionists who had led the two Russian revolutions. He understood everything.

In short, it made a lot of reproaches against the new Algerian leaders. The massacres were only beginning in Algeria and after the small settlers, the Algerians who had collaborated with the French would follow until they ended in fighting and assassinations between the leaders of the FNL to retain power in a solitary and absolute way.

The strategy in Paris was able to choose to ensure that the FNL massacres were as large as possible to show the Algerians what they had just lost… with de Gaulle who had loved them so much.

https://www.facebook.com/GoodmArmy

document:

On July 12, 1961, General Charles de Gaulle addressed the French once again in a context of extreme gravity.

“A few weeks earlier, the first Evian conference, opened on May 20 between France and GPRA, was suspended for lack of agreement, particularly on the Sahara issue. At the same time, attacks are increasing on both sides of the Mediterranean. The Secret Armed Organization (SAO) is stepping up its actions, while the conflict continues to claim new lives every day. »

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BomAjH7jC/

We do not reproduce here the testimony of a close relative of our family who lived in early 1963 in the port of Algiers, the last departure of French troops after the massacres of Oran and Algiers committed by the FNL. On the dock before boarding, with FNL machine guns in their backs, they had to lay down their weapons to keep only their small suitcase of personal belongings. Behind the fences were Algerians and settlers who wanted to escape to France and who had not been able to leave the previous days and who now had to be abandoned. Members of the FNL, knives in hand, were at the gate of this fenced area, ready for the massacre, once the French soldiers and among their officers, Jean-Marie Le Pen, were on board the ship. Memories of atrocities that still haunt this person.

The Battle of France in 2026

We no longer want the representative democracy established by Sieyès in 1790 and never questioned since. Citizens’ representatives are only seeking election and re-election. The constitutions have all been blocked since 1790 to defend the representatives in place. In the Ancien Régime, when the kingdom’s coffers were empty, the king had the obligation to bring together the States-General to rebuild the country. This was the only provision of the Old Regime to be retained to ensure, in the event of a crisis, a political transition with the assistance of the citizens.

This largely explains why we no longer expect anything from our politicians… no future of Gaulle on the horizon in these political parties.

The struggle is no longer the establishment of a provisional government from the Resistance, today we are developing a new civilization without autocratic systems of power and without theocracies with their criminal religious dogmas. Like the flourishing civilizations of history.

We have nothing to invent, just to remember, to know the history and especially the one that was forbidden by our leaders to defend their usurped power to the citizens.

Our desire for freedom, our will to live free is no longer limited to one nation but among nations France is the guardian of access to this new flourishing civilization and for two centuries the medieval period was the last flourishing period in Europe.

The last one to have taken up arms to defend the time of the cathedrals was burned by the English, the Anglo-Saxons with the complicity of the bishop who heads the University of Paris.

« The intervention of the University of Paris in support of the condemnation of Joan of Arc at the stake is clear from the will of the supporters of the King of France to reject once again any movement towards a network organization of society as in the time of monastic communities and knights, free cities and communal assemblies.

The university led by a bishop in the pope’s pay resolved the dilemma.

Tainted by numerous irregularities, this trial was revisited by Pope Calixtus III in 1455. A second trial was conducted, which concluded in 1456 that Jeanne was innocent and rehabilitated her entirely.

Thanks to these two trials, the minutes of which have been preserved, she is one of the best known personalities of the Middle Ages. »

Roosevelt wondered how to deal with a Frenchman who thought he was both Napoleon and Joan of Arc.

Obviously he did not know much about the history of France. Napoleon did not resume the fight to restore the time of the cathedrals and to end the representative Republic decided by the Convention and Sieyès in 1789. Gaullism could have captured this fight, but it did not despite the late referendum of 1969. It’s up to us today to follow in Jeanne’s footsteps.

Gaullism

Marie-France Garaud

A testimony of a political figure who avoids declaring herself Gaullist because she does not want to put herself on the same level as that of the FFL, the CNR and the provisional government of France: Marie-France Garaud.

« I have not experienced the greatest, most beautiful and most demanding thing: the Gaullism of war. […]I have too much respect for what Gaullism was to dare to call myself a Gaullist. »

https://www.facebook.com/reel/3493898410763076

This statement by Marie-France Garaud is very interesting. The Gaullism of the war is the one highlighted in the film The Battle of Gaulle.

Marie-France Garaud defines Gaullism (and shoots the RPR) in 1981, the complete video of the TV show:

The false Gaullists.

But there are also the Gaullists who arrived after the war, the opportunists and why not the false Gaullists. These are among others people who have traded markets with the German occupiers and who have come forward with them. Sensing the wind of history turning, they made a facade of new resistance fighters.

Some, notably in Normandy, after having worked and enriched themselves with the Germans for supplies and materials of the Atlantic Wall, presented themselves as new resistance fighters and to have weapons, they stole them from official networks of resistance fighters and who had received these weapons during parachuting into the maquis. Normandy had been well equipped with weapons before the landing.

When the region was liberated, for example, a group of official resistance fighters decided to recover the weapons stolen from them and massacred the false resistance fighters in order to take revenge. But the leader of these fake resistance later managed to be admitted as a resistance fighter and later he entered the narrow circle of Gaullist leaders and became part of the SAC, the Civic Action Service. In this region, during this period, there were several armed conflicts to steal weapons and this was also the case in other regions.

A minister Resistant from the first hour and Gaullist, will want to clean up the Gaullist ranks based precisely on the same appreciation, the same definition of Gaullism of Marie France Garaud. He allegedly committed suicide by drowning in a puddle on the edge of a pond…Closely linked to the SAC, the attorney general in Versailles had sabotaged the first autopsy of the victim’s body, asking the forensic experts not to examine his skull. This body was found right next to the residence of René Journiac, Giscard’s « Monsieur Afrique ».

To continue our comment on De Gaulle and Algeria during the tragic evacuation with the intervention of Franco, the events of Algiers in 1958 also raise questions. The FLN trained its leaders in Moscow and after 1962 Algeria entered the sphere of influence and economic aid of the Soviet Union.

The debate remains open on the origin of the events in Algiers in 1958. The hypothesis of the intervention of the CIA to support a group of French determined to remain French in a French Algeria with soldiers and large settlers, those who after the American landing of November 1942 had mocked Darlan imposed by Roosevelt against De Gaulle, explains the triggering of this major political crisis to force the General to return to power.

He certainly understood this scheme well as the majority will of the French citizens of Algeria to remain in an autonomous Algeria but still present in France after having chosen this solution during a referendum of self-determination. Except that autonomous Algeria was no longer ruled as before by the only large settlers with a public administration at the service of their interests.

We understand better why Marie France Garaud limits the Gaullist movement to the Gaullism of the war and not with an extension during the Algerian war then under Pompidou, Giscard or Chirac…

Another approach to Gaullism:

« At the Mourmelon camp, on July 8, 1962, after the parade of French and German troops before Chancellor Adenauer, General Dodelier, chief of the special staff, told me that the General had retouched with his hand, in 1959, the ritual formula by which a general officer ordered officers, non-commissioned officers and soldiers, sailors or airmen of a regiment, a warship or a squadron, to obey a new leader: « You will recognize him as a leader for the execution of military regulations, the good of service, the observance of the laws and the success of France’s weapons. »

« This formula, with its gradation that says it all, looks great. »

source: It was de Gaulle, Alain Peyrefitte, volume II

« On August 2, 1956, General de Gaulle visited the Special Military School of Saint-Cyr and addressed the students in a short speech filled with confidence and hope: « I am very happy to see you, not only because to be among you, it makes me go back to the inclination of my young years but also because when I saw Saint-Cyr, when I saw the school vigorous, alive, I felt a kind of brilliant confirmation of what I thought in great and hard times, namely that we should not give up, that we had to fight, that we had, despite everything, to snatch for France a piece of victory. Well, it was done. …/… »

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DSGrLvwUJ/

Definition of Gaullism by Admiral Philippe de Gaulle: « The moral sense of the Nation. The constant of French values of all time. »

illustration: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Kgd4C7bdE/

« Culture dominates everything » https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19BsQzG8sS/

What the General didn’t do.

The limit that de Gaulle did not want or dared to cross, because he knew it, is indeed finance.

Quote from François Mauriac on de Gaulle:

The same goes for Mitterrand.

This consequence of the inaction of these Presidents is unfortunately well known:

France, the most plutocratic country in Europe:

Two examples to illustrate the fact that this high finance now works directly with the President of the Republic and his government.

She seized power by directly imposing the President in 2017 and 2022.

« What happens is that a small number of elected officials are concentrating a large number of powers… and then they are very easily corruptible. »

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1547809500215781

The wealthiest use the President of the Republic to carry out their projects, as in the case of the A 69 motorway, a project contested at the local level.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19WyE3cmmD/

We will come back to this issue of finance and our freedom at the end of this forum, the Final Battle.

The Strange Defeat in 2026

French errors:

In this forum, we present the most alarming situations regarding the renunciation of our leaders to defend and develop our economy, our knowledge and our scientific and medical research.

We find in these distressing examples the same causes as the strange defeat of 1940.

The dilution of responsibility is no longer solely French.

Elected officials, in order to promote their re-election, have always sought to eliminate in their electoral zone the various social conflicts linked to economic activity and especially to collective redundancies and company closures. The relocation of production and the deindustrialization of the country have met their expectations. The more integration into Europe has the remarkable consequence in France that we are almost the only country that immediately adopts European directives without negotiating anything.

The most scandalous example dates back to 2010 when the European Commission blackmailed France for unfair competition on the particularly low electricity price in France thanks to nuclear energy.

Nicolas Sarkozy threatened with a fine of 20 billion euros had to give in to this blackmail.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EHr1kqYcL/

This competitive advantage annoyed German industrialists who had bet everything on cheap Russian gas supplied by pipelines to Germany. The former head of French intelligence confirms what many suspected.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/18S2nMMPgq/

Europe has a good back, except that it is acting to develop American interests and neo-liberalism. The French specificity is disappearing more and more.

Who blew up our energy bills? Who will kill German industry after destroying French industry? The European Commission.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BbnJRZaZV/

Political debates are essentially ideological between political parties.

Citizens no longer support the decisions made by people who know nothing about it and do not go to the field. There is no bottom-up subsidiarity and no means of citizen expression to lead to any decision.

Strategic teaching is based on theoretical rules of engagement, elegant and abstract, which do not pass the test of practice, as in the years 1930-1940.

As Marc Bloch denounced, « the absurdity of our official propaganda, its irritating and crude optimism, its timidity », and above all « the inability of our government to honestly define its war goals ». The immobility and weakness of ministers are stigmatized, and the abandonment of their responsibilities to technicians, recruited on the same corporatist basis (École Polytechnique and Sciences-Po, especially). All this little world is advancing in the age in a common culture of contempt for the people, whose resources are underestimated. In short, nothing has changed.

« You can’t imagine the level of ignorance at the highest level of the state! »

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EhTEtzVVG/

Conformism that leads to a certain passivity if not a general indifference has not been eliminated.

As Marc Bloch once noted: « Few people are blind, but only no one dares to raise their voices and denounce shortcomings before they are revealed by the conflict and, therefore, we dare not question received ideas. »

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27%C3%89trange_D%C3%A9faite

Yet we are able to carry out beautiful projects recognized throughout the world. The last two examples are the 2024 Olympic Games and the reconstruction of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.

This is exactly the management of the Life Project Teams that we describe in Our Life Networks.

How did a country with a reputation for bureaucratic red tape deliver two globally acclaimed projects? An investor recounts the unknown behind the scenes of the preparation of the Olympics and the reconstruction of Notre-Dame.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1D1p5QYnnG/

« To revive cranes and factories, we need to reform our administration! » Jean-Louis Borloo, former minister was on LCI.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/15Jf5cGpRmB/

The forest fires of the summer of 2026 in Gironde and Var were the occasion for new testimonies of conflict of authority between state representatives and local elected officials.

These elected officials no longer want to respect the prevailing conformity and they decide to exercise themselves directly the command to fight in their communes against these forest fires.

le maire de Seillons veut diriger la lutte contre les feux de forêts

Are farmers being evicted for helping firefighters? The mayor of Seillons says no! “I will be master of my own house, not the prefect. I am an elected official of the territory, not a state agent… In my town, the mayor will be in charge, not the prefect!” After days of fighting the blaze alongside firefighters, farmers in the Var region have reportedly been ordered to leave the area. The mayor of Seillons is opposed to this.

« As the fire spirals out of control, we decided to help firefighters by allowing them to fill their trucks faster with our tanks. »

la solidarité dans la lutte contre les feux de forêts été 2026
solidarity in the fight against forest fires summer 2026.
France is the technocratic absurdistan when we learn that to feed our firefighters with sandwiches, you need a purchase order!

And what about when the president of the local DFCI had to wait two and a half days to be authorized to make tactical cuts and firewalls.

We can no longer operate with standards dating back to the 1980s and 1990s, we have changed dimensions: when we are in an emergency situation, we must be able to decide everything locally and we take responsibility for it.

Christian Pinaudeau, expert in risk management.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Ekr3yPrSg/

« Technocrats and politicians in Paris would have been better off listening to people on the ground, to forest professionals like Bruno Lafon and to firefighters, because we wouldn’t be there! Today, we note with bitterness that they did not take these people into account and that they did not respond to the security, economic and environmental challenges around the French forest! »

Destroying before rebuilding is the motto of the globalists: destroy the forest before building the largest solar park in Europe: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DQTx8R7GM/

The practice of subsidiarity allows the elimination of this conformism established by the leaders of the autocratic systems of power through the representative institutions of our republics since 1790 and the will of Abbot Sieyès to the Convention. This error of 1789 is still not corrected. We might as well change civilization to leave these systems of power and theocracies with their religious dogmas.

These mistakes have political, economic, social and cultural consequences that in 2026 make France a country on the brink of a wall,

of the abyss and its ranking among the countries continues to decline.

However, this situation is the subject of some public or media debates. Whistleblowers are still there. Freedom of information and thought has been curtailed by the privatization of the media in the hands of billionaires.

Some examples here of information or debates not disseminated by the official media.

Super Phoenix shutdown

We were 30 years ahead of every other country with a technology that guaranteed energy independence for 7,000 years by abandoning the use of enriched uranium.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2871821666512461

Energy decisions:

The European obligation to follow the competition on the markets obliges EDF to commercial practices which result in its loss of productivity and an inability to finance future projects. This is a major political scandal.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1462375695541021

Energy and the “Purchasing Power” Bill, the rant of a member of Parliament

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DyhJQRwmT/

The Wind and Solar Scandal

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Bo7gwLKoh/

Wind turbines: money wasted by the state

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1C7aTWo4YV/

RENEWABLE ENERGY SCANDAL: CONTRACTS UP TO €700 PER MWh WHILE THE MARKET IS AT €50!

One figure that was particularly highlighted during an audit was that while electricity market prices are estimated at around EUR 40-50 per MWh, the average effective price of some purchase obligation contracts would be around EUR 174 per MWh. The gap would be even greater for some technologies. Photovoltaics is mentioned in particular with an average level of EUR 266 per MWh, while onshore wind would approach EUR 100 and offshore wind around EUR 170. In the area of energy policy, several particularly critical questions have been raised concerning the purchase obligation contracts concluded for certain renewable energy sectors.’

Comment FB 10/08/2026 by D. H.: And, icing on the cake, these PPP contracts are accompanied by volume guarantees. Not only is electricity purchased at an inordinate price, but there is a commitment to quantity, whether it is produced or not. If the guaranteed volume of electricity is 100 but the production is only 50 due to lack of wind / sunshine, you still have to pay for 100 at the agreed price!

Another comment by J. L.: the beneficiaries of these lucrative contracts are American pension funds to pay American retirees… so money that leaves France! And it’s not because you paid 10€ Mw/h that it’s general, you don’t buy a train ticket, plane, bus, juice, etc… all identical the same price! These are the investment funds that have « imposed » a price and it is the state that says AMEN and it is you who pay…».

France must disconnect its own renewable energies remotely as of December 2026 to avoid negative prices: the threshold will fall to 1 MW

« An order published discreetly in the Official Journal on July 24, 2026 has lowered the threshold of the curtailment mechanism (which could be translated into French as « capping », the remote shutdown of solar and wind installations) from 10 MW to 1 MW.

For the layperson, this means that as of December 1, 2026, a very large number of solar farms, parking shades and onshore wind farms will have to be able to automatically disconnect from the electricity grid as soon as prices go negative. This is a direct consequence of the explosion of the negative price phenomenon, which now affects France almost one hour out of ten.

Negative prices, the new plague of the French electrical system.

Crucial point for producers: financial compensation is maintained. In other words, an operator who receives an order to stop production continues to receive the guaranteed rate under his contract, as if the electricity had been produced normally. A nuance that has its importance. It is not the producer who loses money with the new mechanism, it is the French taxpayer who saves. In concrete terms, when a solar park produces at a negative price while collecting its guaranteed tariff (for example €90/MWh on an old contract), the contribution to the Public Electricity Service (CSPE, levied on our electricity bills for a total amount of €12.94 billion in 2026 according to the CRE) must cover the full difference between the two. Stopping it during these hours avoids this double cost. In its deliberation of 15 July 2026, the Energy Regulatory Commission estimated the expected savings for the State budget of €100 million per year due to the extension of the scheme to installations of more than 1 MW. »

ESCROLOGY! Cost of shutting down wind farms in the UK: £1 billion this year.

In the UK, the cost of shutting down wind farms during storm winds has reached £1 billion this year – and these costs are being passed on to consumers’ energy bills…

The cost comes from payments to wind farms in remote areas to shut down when they generate too much electricity to transport – while also paying gas plants near cities to compensate.

The issue is not the automatic shutdown of turbines during storms alone, but the inability of the grid to move abundant production, often from Scotland, to the high-consumption areas of southern England, according to The Times.

The end of Le Creusot and nuclear know-how

In 1984, France abandoned the heart of its industry.

Creusot-Loire. A name that many have forgotten. However, this company literally forged parts that no other European country could manufacture.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/870245292771241

75 million emails exploited by the NSA against France, the Alstom affair.

« Arnaud Montebourg tells a chilling story, the Americans used their global surveillance capabilities to detect suspicions of corruption at Alstom, in markets that did not even concern the United States, before prosecuting them under extraterritorial laws.

His account, an Alstom executive, Frédéric Pierucci, was arrested at New York airport and jailed for two years for refusing to betray his country. As a result, the weakened company was eventually acquired by General Electric.

Its conclusion, a real operation of economic predation by illegal means, revealing a balance of power that France took time to understand.

Did you know about this Alstom affair? »

How could France have let go of such a vital part of its energy independence?

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1UpTVYuA5e/

Can no longer be treated:

Disbursement of Sector 3 prescriptions as of 2027! As of January 1, 2027, medical prescriptions issued by doctors practicing in sector 3 will no longer be reimbursed by the Health Insurance.

As explained in the video of Pharmagistrale, sector 3 includes non-contracted practitioners who practice free fees.

In this sector, patients already pay the entire consultation out of their own pocket, because the tariffs imposed in sector 1 (agreed tariffs) no longer allow doctors to be profitable.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1575955513878154

Healing by plants

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2875893092756485

The protection of Big Pharma and its industrial laboratories is part of the medical tyranny, other possibilities of care based on natural products are still prohibited except herbs and plants for infusions of well-being.

Giving death is the ultimate care.

The law on the end of life turns to the legalization of euthanasia pure and simple to eliminate health costs deemed unnecessary while the country is heavily indebted (we will return to it in the Final Battle)

MP Falorni, a supporter of euthanasia, explained that “assisted dying for the vast majority of people will be an aid to living”. Recently the philosopher Raphael Enthoven, for his part, philosophized that « giving death is the ultimate care »

If « dying » is « living », then « the truth » is « lying », then « war is peace », or « freedom is slavery », as the writer Georges Orwell had prophesied.

Georges Orwell, before becoming a writer, was employed at the BBC where he was able to observe the power of Nazi propaganda methods.

In an essay on the Spanish War, he notes that Nazi theory denies the existence of a « thing » such as the « truth, » and tries to take control of the past by turning the leader’s claims into absolute truth:

« If he says two and two are five, well, two and two are five. »

If the leader, the power, the state – no matter what he calls himself – says that to die is to live, well: he is right!

However, at Nancy University Hospital, neurosurgery begins to sculpt the brains to remove tumors and cure patients:

« This may seem unimaginable for the average person and yet very real for Fabien Rech, neurosurgeon at Nancy University Hospital. With his medical team, Lorrain frequently operates on patients with brain tumors by waking them up in the middle of the operation, with their skulls open. »

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1E9DW1WVax/

Pensions are too expensive and financiers earn less profit

« Pensions: freezing pensions until 2030 back on the table to reduce the deficit. »

The Pension Monitoring Committee, attached to Matignon, recommends freezing pensions until 2030 in order to restore the financial balance of the system.

In concrete terms, pensions would not fall, but would no longer be revalued in line with inflation for several years. Today, they are normally indexed to price increases (after +5% in 2024, +2.2% in 2025 and +0.9% in January 2026).

Proponents of this measure believe that it would curb the spending of a system that pays out nearly €400 billion in pensions a year.

The unions are strongly opposed to it. For Dominique Corona (UNSA), this is a « simplistic measure », admittedly « financially effective », but « ineffective on consumption and GDP ». According to him, a decrease in the purchasing power of retirees would lead to less consumption, less production and therefore less tax revenue.

This proposal is not new: it had already been put forward last year and included in the draft budget before finally being abandoned. It is now resurfacing as pension financing remains one of the main challenges facing public finances. »

FB 10/07/2026 7pm Pure TV

Behind this so-called « agricultural emergency » law, it is indeed the sharing of water that is being called into question.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/3332782963591892

« The Senate right has chosen to defend an agricultural model based on ever more withdrawals, especially from groundwater, to the benefit of a few actors and to the detriment of other farmers, communities and inhabitants.

At a time when tensions over water resources continue to worsen, this choice is irresponsible. It’s a real headlong rush.

To allow this water capture, the Senate has unraveled water democracy: reducing the role of local elected officials, strengthening the power of the prefect and placing water agencies under trusteeship by the Ministry of Agriculture.

We have proposed compromises to better protect the resource, support the agricultural world and avoid exacerbating conflicts of use. They were all rejected.

The text still has to go through the Joint Committee. The government cannot allow these provisions to be included in the final legislation.

It’s time for mobilization. »

https://www.facebook.com/RonanDantec

FB 03/07/2026 at 10:10 pm

The political choices of our successive governments are leading us straight into the wall!

The Peasant Confederation:

The short-term responses put forward by the Ministry of Agriculture are not up to the situation. They reveal the lack of political will to undertake the transformations that are necessary to ensure the future of peasant women.

We refuse to consider these disasters as inevitable. The urgency lies in defending our ability to feed ourselves healthily in the coming years.

FB Confédération paysanne, 12/07/2026 at 7pm

https://www.facebook.com/reel/924645890651178

Another example is clean-cutting in forests.

The worst possible configuration: a clean cut on a slope of nearly 50%.

It’s happening in the Cantal, a local woman alerted us. Bruno, a companion at Canopée, immediately launched satellite analyses, and they are formal: the forest that was standing there was healthy.

Instead, young Douglas seedlings drying out in the sun. Some did not survive the heatwave, and the rest probably will not weather the next heatwave.

Without forest cover, the land erodes, sediments drift down into waterways, and the risk of landslides increases.

Who authorized this cup? And why?

https://www.facebook.com/reel/858291993675201

The rest: the prefect forbids drones to film the forest and the clean cuts. Motive: it bothers wolves. We are well in France and in the Massif Central in 2026…..

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1425745432919327

‘An intergenerational scam’: how boomers ruined Europe and mortgaged the future of youth

« Boomers » bear a heavy responsibility for rising inequality and the dangerous lethargy that has gripped the Old Continent vis-à-vis the United States and Asia.

https://www.challenges.fr/economie/immobilier-elections-retraites-pourquoi-les-seniors-sont-une-veritable-plaie-pour-leurope_643875

We point out here this purely manipulative statement: it is a question of guilt and devaluing an age group in relation to the youngest. The boomers never gained power over the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy and the wealthiest to change public policies and develop a new flourishing civilization as we wish to establish here. Of course, they did not rebel to oust these leaders. But what about the parents who are helplessly witnessing the drop in the level of education, the scrapping of the social elevator that the parents of the boomers paid to offer their children better economic and social situations.

This statement is purely and simply cynical, it is part of the panoply of propaganda spread by the ideologues of the neo-liberal system.

The IPCC manipulated by billionaires?

You’re not dreaming. The very idea of an exit from capitalism is deliberately censored by those who control the world economy. In an explosive interview, Monique Pinçon-Charlot denounces the chilling complicity between the state, finance and multinationals like TotalEnergies. Find out how “green capitalism” is just a vast deception designed to open up new financial markets on the back of ecology.

https://lifebelief24.com/bang9/guerre-climatique-et-separatisme-des-riches-comment-loligarchie-saccage-le-monde-et-comment-sy-preparer/

Capitalism pushes its cynicism to a stratospheric level.

Marc Eichinger reveals on Thinkerview how Daesh financed its attacks: thanks to its oil, transported by a French company, laundered by Swiss traders and sold in Europe.

While our governments coerce us in the name of anti-terrorism, the invisible hand of the market does business with the executioners. Suits and ties validated blood oil just to inflate shareholder dividends.

Neoliberalism is summarized in a sequence: we die under bullets financed by fuel that we ourselves helped to market. Ethics stops where profit begins.

#Thinkerview#Anticapitalism#StateCynicism#SocialJustice

The spy who wants us good? Marc Eichinger

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2011727229444250

The plan for the destruction of peoples

Marleix une élite veut liquider la France et depuis 2017 elle est au pouvoir

For forty years, an elite has wanted to liquidate France. Since 2017, this elite has been in power. Olivier Marleix. Tragically disappeared on July 7, 2025.

There is economic predation and all the forces, nations that are doomed to disappear. This is their objective, and they regularly talk about it, in particular, to the European Union. They want to make sure that nations no longer exist to replace them with the United States of Europe, which will be neither states nor united because there will be nothing left.”

Replay the show: https://youtu.be/za79l4axxco

Psychologist Marion Saint-Michel develops her #analyse of the evolution of European #institutions and the relations between #États, believing that the current transformations are part of a long-term dynamic. According to her, several developments would converge towards a gradual weakening of the role of #nations.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1009077455244998

Christine Deviers-Joncour: we fall into hell.

it could have brought down the Fifth Republic on its own: frigate affairs, corruption against the backdrop of oil contracts, kickbacks, covert financing, targeted assassinations, etc.

The woman who could have brought down the Fifth Republic! – Interview with Christine Deviers-Joncour

an excerpt from the interview: duration 19 minutes

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JFbnpnY8M/

The full interview link:

The secret war against the peoples.

The book by Claire Séverac

https://www.cultura.com/p-la-guerre-secrete-contre-les-peuples-9782954012636.html

We could go on and on with this list of what is wrong and what has become unbearable for citizens.

On February 2, 1905, Alissa Zinovievna, a Russian philosopher and writer better known in the literary world as Ayn Rand, was born in St. Petersburg.

She said:

Ayn Rand en 1943
Ayn Rand in 1943

Let’s take action to develop our solutions, our improvements and change civilization.

The final battle.

French dissidents know how to rebuild a flourishing civilization, we have progressed since 1940 and 1945, with the audacity to take an interest in the forbidden law, the one used in the flourishing civilizations and during the medieval period in Europe. And this on the advice of our professor of Commercial Law at the end of our studies.

The good jurist knows the Positive Law on which we passed our exams but also the Forbidden Law that we were invited to learn with our legal methods validated by our Faculty of Law. This is what we have done since the age of 19 as a laureate of our Faculty of Law in History of Law and Contemporary Political, Economic and Social Institutions. And since then we have learned a lot and written.

For example, in 4th year, in Commercial Law, the subject of the June exam, that year, was the bill of exchange. Whoever writes this text gets the best score: 17/20 for his 3-part plan and 15/20 for his 2-part plan. The 3rd highest score was 13/20. Only our teacher had not taught us that this practice had been used between 1945 and 1972 through the Treasury circuit to finance the reconstruction and modernization of France. We were after 1973 and he had been careful not to explain to us his essential role just to build and open our University in its new buildings. He certainly wanted to remain a professor at least until his retirement. Since 2016 we present on fileane.com the economic institution of the Positive Money to develop a new civilization. We have learned a lot, we are ready to become free again… as in 1940 in London in dark and rainy weather…

The fight changed in dimension and soul but the enemy remained the same. For 2,500 years people have been subjected to autocratic systems of power and theocracies. We understand well how they operate and with what ideologies and religious dogmas they subjugate peoples.

maman pourquoi nous avons la guerre

Mom why we have war ?

Because we are led by an elite of psychopaths who control banks, governments and the media. They sell weapons to all camps and encourage war by the media for the sole purpose of making more money and controlling companies and whole countries. They hold us through the debts.

Our enemy of finance has been entrenched for centuries in the countries of Churchill and Roosevelt. Whereas in France between 1945 and 1972, the country was rehabilitated and modernized without public debts, with the same monetary means as during the medieval period and especially during the millennia of Egyptian civilization, except that this monetary means was reserved for large companies that responded to public orders, which is still a good start but which remains perfectible.

Our politicians do not want to break the ban on its use because they are subject to this power of the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy, when we know how to ruin it and put it out of order to harm humanity. They are subjected to corruption and blackmail and become small tyrants in the service of the great tyrants.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1NT2jxsVm7/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GKgA14YPZ/

As we know, there is no longer any secret about this calamitous situation and its crimes committed in organized gangs that are crimes against citizens.

La République en McKinsey 2026
All of Macron’s relatives have worked or are working for MC KINSEY

This Final Battle has been hoped for centuries; seven at least and since Friday, October 13, 1307 when the King of France destroyed the order of the Temple and put an end to the medieval period, the last flourishing period in Europe.

The final battle over the money problem.

Without entering Balzac’s life, this statement is certainly influenced by his meetings in George Sand’s circle of friends and especially during a meeting with Pierre Leroux that we present elsewhere on fileane.com.

To win this final battle and solve most if not all of our problems, eliminating the problem of money means using our debt-free sovereign currency to finance our life projects with a debt-free currency as was the case in the flourishing civilizations of the past, during the medieval period, the last flourishing period in Europe, and during the reconstruction and modernization of France between 1945 and 1972.

Clearly, it is no longer a question of borrowing from international bankers who create money ex nihilo, from nothing as counterfeiters do. They have taken power globally and forbid us to use our currency without debt.

A full currency without debt operates through the circulation of bills of exchange between economic actors or that of Treasury Bills issued by the Banque de France nationalized since 1945. These bills of exchange have been used by the ancient Egyptian civilization for its internal trade and its trade at the world level.

https://fileane.com/fr/reseaux-de-vie/partie-01-les-institutions-des-reseaux-de-vie/la-monnaie-pleine/

Free our political institutions from the issue of public debt.

During our law studies, in the first year, our professor of Constitutional Law, during the first hour, explains to us that there was only one provision of the Ancien Régime to keep: when the coffers of the kingdom were empty, the king had the obligation to bring together the States-General and the representatives of the people had to agree on practical solutions and measures to pursue the monarchy.

The Constituents of 1789 understood the risk that this entailed for them because, like the king, they were not irremovable and therefore with each financial difficulty they would lose their places in power. So they have not taken over this provision and all the Constitutions since 1790 are closed, blocked. Even with public budgets and finances running deficits and indebted, elected officials remain in office. To remain in place, they will obviously take austerity measures to return to an acceptable financial balance.

We reported that in 2013 JP Morgan called for authoritarian regimes in Europe to force citizens to accept the austerity policies needed to repay public debts. « However, for JPMorgan this is not enough. In order to avoid a social revolution in the coming period, its analysts warn that it is essential that capitalist governments across Europe prepare as quickly as possible to set up dictatorial forms of rule. »

We are here at the level of legal knowledge, at the level of a political regime and the Constitution of a country.

But to remain in place, the elected representatives in a representative republic set up in 1789 at the initiative of Abbé Sieyès, will also prohibit the other much more judicious alternative to finance economic development and which is at the heart of a participatory local direct democracy: the full sovereign currency, i.e. without debts.

We are here at the level of economic and financial knowledge on the use of a currency in a human society.

The choice to use a form of money to achieve precise wealth creation objectives with the work of all.

Money has several forms, several sources according to the usefulness it must have for who directs it.

  • Full currency, Positive Money, without debt belongs to the citizens.

It uses the common property managed directly by a social group.

For trade and economic development at the service of the people, the sovereign currency belongs to the citizens in the form of bills of exchange that circulate between economic actors and are expected from the National Bank or the institution that represents the citizens.

It is the debt-free full currency used in Egyptian civilization and then in the medieval period, the last flourishing period in Europe. It was set up by the Benedictine monks through the Order of the Temple and their bank. This full currency in the form of Treasuries discounted by the Banque de France nationalized since 1945 was used by governments between 1945 and 1972 to rebuild and modernize the country.

  • Fiat money belongs to the person with political power

To be the instrument of the power of a ruler, a king, an emperor, money is the property of that ruler. To develop it, this fiat currency is based on precious metals, gold, silver and precious stones.

  • Paper money and then cash in the form of accounting entries

has allowed phenomenal economic development led by central banks that have a monopoly on the issuance of this currency.

This currency can be debt-free when using Treasury bills and bills of exchange.

But it can also make the unlimited fortune of private central banks at the heart of Anglo-Saxon capitalism and financial oligarchy. It serves the submission of the people by the richest.

  • Finally, the most dangerous and immoral form is the printing press.

Before any economic and political project, the one that uses it has only one goal: to destroy enemies, opponents, ruin people through trade distorted by unlimited subsidies, aggressive dumping that distorts any competitiveness between economic actors.

We know who does what and who prohibits full currency without public and private debts. And the leaders who use the printing press and the scriptural currency of private central banks together are initially located in the United States and on Wall Street. As for the BRICS, they have not yet specified that it forms currency they want to use and what forms they prohibit and fight.

The Final Battle uses full currency without debts

For us French, it is clear and simple: return to the debt-free currency used between 1945 and 1972 and then improve it within the framework of a participatory local direct democracy with free cities, life project teams, subsidiarity and the alliance of opposites, management centers, the confederation and its plan for political, economic, social, cultural development, etc. in…. short without autocratic systems of power and without Theocracies with their criminal religious dogmas.

The final battle uses new weapons compared to past conventional wars.

We present these new weapons on fileane.com in different places. We’re just quoting them here. Most are known, some remain banned or ignored.

In the novel D’Éleusis à Dendérah the Forbidden Evolution, the characters develop a flourishing civilization based on the use of our two sources of spiritual and intellectual knowledge. They follow the model of the ancient Egyptian civilization.

Spiritual experiences help develop spiritual weapons.

They are briefly presented in episode 10 of the novel, the Conference of Nancy suite et fin.

In the novel, Pierre uses them in the experience of Sophia Antipolis. Separated from his carnal body, he enters a room equipped with a Faraday cage to secure the work of engineers who develop a new weapon for the army. He takes a few documents and photocopies them to bring them back and present them to his friends.

Later in the clue battles, he and the 3 other characters he trained in the use of the spiritual powers of the higher world, will attack the enemy, destroy his weaponry and they will bring the wounded and the dead from both sides by levitation to the infirmary of their army.

These spiritual powers are usually used during outings outside the carnal body: passage through walls, projection to distant destinations, change of space-time, etc.

There is also the erasure of language barriers and the understanding of what any other human being says as well as the ability to come into contact with him with the language of the heart.

Not to mention the remote visualization of what is happening while remaining in his carnal body. This technique is used by hunters of the first peoples who then know where the game is.

Intellectual and scientific, technological knowledge develop the new weapons.

In the novel written between 1990 and 1994, we present the first electronic warfare centers and the knights of their movement will build one. In 2026, these technologies have evolved but their objectives are the same.

In the novel their electronic warfare center will take control of financial trading rooms to disrupt and distort financial markets by ruining most rentiers and investors. Here we are very close to the objective of the final Battle indicated by Honoré de Balzac.

The knights will also take control of a television channel to present instead of the usual newspaper, their own version of events and their objectives to leave the autocratic systems of power.

The presentation of Egyptian civilization in the chapter Theocracies and religious dogmas, indicates that among the Atlanteans and then among the survivors, the Golden Circle develops this guard of weapons and their development with the most advanced scientific and spiritual knowledge. These weapons aim to research and understand the astral evolutions capable of threatening Life on Earth and then to put in place the material means to ensure the survival of human beings and their knowledge during the next great cataclysm and any deterioration of the living conditions on our planet. The intellectual and mystical translation of this knowledge is found in the Mystery of the Apocalypse intended to prepare a generation of human beings to survive this great cataclysm and then develop a new civilization in a new covenant with the Creator.

The Concordat defines the use of our two sources of knowledge

Presented briefly in episode 10 of the novel at the Nancy Conference, it defines the use of our spiritual source of Knowledge and the use of our intellectual, rational and scientific source.

It develops our spiritual experiences through the use of our first initiatory source of knowledge and our practice of the mystical way through the use of our second source of scientific rational intellectual knowledge.

Modeled on the Egyptian model, he develops the Alliance with the Creator of all life who lives among his creation and thus in each of us. To study the evolutions of creation and their opportunities or threats, the Golden Circle develops the calculations necessary for the observation of astral evolutions and the evolutions of the planet Earth.

In conclusion

Among these battles, the breath and spirit to lead our audacity to new spaces of freedom remain the same.

One important difference, however, is that the use of spiritual experiences and weapons during our individual initiation leads us to no longer be afraid of the death of our carnal body. The fearless and blameless knight returns to service.

The warrior, as we said at the beginning of this forum, unlike the soldier, carries within him a peace plan to end the war.

Warriors like De Gaulle or Patton at the end of the war will say that they did not understand its course and will be surprised. Yes, they clearly ignored who was leading this war and why.

Today we know what they did not know and did not fight and defeat: the financing and the direction of wars by financiers and their bankers. For centuries, their goal has been the same: to finance the two sides fighting to make this struggle last as long as possible in order to obtain miraculous profits impossible in peacetime. Since 2013 JP Morgan and the other bankers have been financing the means to set up dictatorships in Europe and they start by electing far-right parties, including in France.

These same financiers who declare themselves predestined to govern the world and to subdue the peoples until they destroy them for the glory of their nationalist god alone, continue their criminal and genocidal enterprises by setting up no longer a single pair of enemies, twice the allies against the Germans, but henceforth 4 pairs of enemies, because the profits are now global and their goal is close, the destruction of the peoples and the planet reaches gigantic levels completely crazy.

The American strategy led by a president who is also completely insane (it happens, it is enough to pay a lot of voters) shows that with the war against Iran, this deadly strategy is put in place. The 4 pairs of enemies destined for long wars, destructive to bring long miraculous benefits impossible in peacetime are:

USA vs. China,

Europe vs. Russia,

Iran vs. Arab countries,

Israel with its Zionist sect against the other countries of the Earth since its fanatical leaders declare that international law does not apply to Jews. That is the difference between the elected people and the others. (Bezalel Smotrich, Minister at the Ministry of Defense of Israel)

For our part, in this final struggle, we continue the work of Moses the Egyptian and in our Alliance with the creator who lives in us, through our direct dialog with him, as the man of Galilee also taught us, as the Teutonic and Teutonic knights recited it, we answer him with this universal prayer:

And it’s over with those who want to obtain miraculous profits by financing and leading wars…

  • in place of the bold military and warriors,
  • courageous politicians able to meet the needs of peace and social justice of their peoples
  • and those who resist the current established order, who are also daring to finance human activity with a full currency without debts, such as the Egyptians, the Templars, Napoleon, Lincoln, Schacht, and the French governments between 1945 and 1972, and therefore like de Gaulle!

Victory by singing the audacity of our battles, freedom guides our steps,

tyrants go down to the coffins.

Continue reading