Politics: The leaders who have sold their masters,what do they want to sell us?

Capitalist, liberal, neo-liberal policies in their pseudo-democracies, we don’t want them anymore!

Or how to respond to the call of the republic and eliminate the democracies established by the power of global finance.

August 19, 2016 updated September 4 and September 11, 2016

My enemies, it’s finance

How many of us reacted to the phrase “my enemies are finance”? Many and even more are today those who understood that these justified remarks were abandoned as soon as the realities of power assumed, that it was a masterful smoke of the citizen will come out majority of the ballot box. As the end of the financial crisis became a real possibility in 2012 by directly fighting the authors of this crisis, these political leaders, by aligning themselves with the liberal doctrine and the world government of Anglo-Saxon finance, have demonstrated by this denial, that they are only sold in the service of the new masters of the world.

Citizens’ rejection of politicians of all stripes is palpable, yet nothing changes in the political game as citizens have understood since 2012 if not long before for some, why finance is our enemy.

Eliminating the power of bankers is again the use of a full, positive, sovereign currency, created by political power in the service of citizens and not created from nothing by bankers when they decide alone whether to grant credit and subject the economy to the law of endless indebtedness to maximize their profits. This monetary and banking technique of full currency, while it is fair and efficient politically, economically and socially, is however little understood by the citizens. The technique is simple and easy to implement. Only all intuitively understand that a change of some management techniques, however indispensable, is not enough.

The political parties, if they have the capacity to understand this monetary technique of full currency, its economic and social scope towards a period once again flourishing, reject this initiative because it carries in it a mortal peril for their interests. Indeed, the issue is not limited to a single currency reform that is relevant even to a society’s common interest. This question, at the heart of political power, clearly separates two ways of organizing political power: democracy and the republic. The use of these two words, of these two political notions, is not neutral.

The Republic and our management of the general interest

The republic is old, it was used long before democracy was established. It is characterized by the use of rules that serve the general interest of the social group. Within the framework of social justice and a humanist culture based on the economic values of abundance, the social values of equity and solidarity to guarantee peace and love, these two fundamental political and cultural values, the rules that guarantee social progress and sustainable development are always the same throughout humanity:

• on the political front: the principle of subsidiarity and the alliance of opposites.

• economically: complementarity between increasing and decreasing returns, protectionism for new activities up to their critical size and break-even point, the use of full sovereign currency to remunerate labor and guarantee trade in the distribution of wealth, the organization of the three levels of human activity: the work essential to life and survival, the realization of works passed on to future generations and which use the wealth produced beyond the abundance which ensures the life and survival of a generation, political action.

• in social terms: complementarity between the three forms of ownership, the use of common ownership for the management of common assets and collective ownership for intangible assets linked to the use of knowledge, mainly the use of the optimal solution obtained by the practice of subsidiarity at the level of political action.

• culturally: the use of the two sources of knowledge available to a human being in order to develop a global knowledge capable of marrying the different social cultures.

The first republics were managed in life networks, by the people and for the people.

The republic has developed among city states, free cities, participatory local democracy, the solidarity economy, the development of the common goods.

The Republic, because it uses the principle of subsidiarity to obtain the optimal solution in the state of available knowledge, develops in a local geographical framework. It allows the optimal solution to be adapted to local circumstances. This structural limit is politically, economically, and socially compelling. The republic is thus universal in the use of optimal solutions and it is sovereign when social groups adapt optimal solutions to their local particularities, where they live.

In this space well controlled by a social group, participatory management, joint and solidarity management, collaborative economy, citizen life networks develop. The association of the different republics, free cities, is realized through powerful confederations capable of ensuring peace and prosperity within the framework of brilliant civilizations.

They were destroyed by power systems and monarchies, theocracies.

Yet the republics, medieval city states, or the more distant states of Egypt or ancient Greece were destroyed by monarchical and military power systems in an effort to extend their rule to larger territories. Indeed, it is possible for a system of power such as the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy to dominate the whole world by establishing a world government, but we are no longer in a republic, on the contrary, the government of the minority of the richest is increasing income inequality and wealth and condemns the majority of humanity to live in perpetual debt if not in new economic and political slavery. The Republic passes on its wealth to future generations and to all; democracy makes the mistake of serving the interests of a minority which demands more and more for itself alone. Democracy lives within the systems of power to develop the voluntary submission to the ruling elite since there is no alternative in a system of power. It is high time to eliminate this nefarious conflation of republic and democracy within states, nation-states.

Democracy was a concept that first appeared in the Enlightenment.

It was used during the revolutions of the 1770s – 1790s: Independence of the United States of North America and the French Revolution.

Political leaders, having eliminated royal absolutism, wanted to preserve the geographical size of monarchical power and above all the centralism of this highly hierarchical power. In conquering power, revolutionaries sought to take advantage of the political structures of royal absolutism or those of an empire to impose in reality their political ideas based above all on the rejection of monarchies, by disregarding or purposefully discarding the republican rules that limit the centralization of power and the development of a minority-led system of power.

For example, Montesquieu might legitimately have demanded the separation of executive, legislative, and judicial powers to eliminate royal absolutism. Yet no republic that functions on its citizens’ participatory management needs this separation of powers. It does not exist in the functioning of citizen networks of life, simply because we are no longer in a system of power and it is more sensible and competitive to organize ourselves differently to develop the mission of authority of citizens.

It all depends on the size of the institution that organizes and manages power. The larger and larger this size becomes, the greater the need for the minority to govern this vast array of regions and peoples.

The century of light has ignored the functioning of the medieval period, that of the time of cathedrals

In medieval times, the time of the cathedrals, last flourishing period in Europe, the communal assemblies were sufficient to manage the common goods, the exchanges between the city and its countryside developed the complementarity between the increasing returns of crafts and trade with the decreasing returns of agriculture and the countryside also became rich and free as the cities.

The explanation is simple: the king of France did not have the logistical and even less financial means to govern at that time the entire territory of the kingdom. He administered and derived wealth solely from his personal domain, which was about 10% of the royal territory.

In 90% of the kingdom, the wealth produced by labor remained on the spot for the benefit of the inhabitants since the communal assemblies obviously decided so for their general interest, their republican interest we dare add today.

Aside from Rome’s system of military power with its roads and messengers, it was from the general use of diligence that it became possible for the king to manage his kingdom in a centralized manner.

Faced with the powers of neighboring empires and monarchies that had expanded through their wars of conquest, in 1789 the question did not arise of federating the former free regions and cities of the medieval period, a flourishing period that should have served as a frame of reference for the revolutionaries but whose memory had been lost because of the rejection and anathema thrown after 1307 by the monarchy and the aristocrats and their bankers. One attempt: in 1787, the representatives of the ten (old) book cities of Alsace formed the college of deputies of the Decapolis and drew up the register of grievances for the States-General summoned by the king of France. This register of grievances calls for recognition of the particular confederation of the Decapolis with its legal status used from 1354 to 1679, the date of the annexation of Alsace to France.

The establishment of the electoral system after 1789

Citizens, as everywhere else, believed in the direct election of municipalities, a pledge of democracy, and the revolutionaries, following the Chapelier Act of 1790, abolished all the structures of the Ancien Régime, including the Decapolis of Alsace. Instead of a federation of cities that develop a common project to ensure peace and prosperity, the revolution establishes communes in which, in the name of defending freedoms, democratic and egalitarian elections legitimize conflicts between citizens.

There is the camp of the pros and that of the counters that vote. The practice of subsidiarity and the search for the optimal solution is ignored or excluded. Revolutionaries give priority to the regime of political parties which actually hide the struggle of interests between new social classes resulting from industrial development.

The dictatorship of the majority party on minority.

These soon develop, first of all the one that pits citizens against the former bourgeois excluded from municipal management by the play of fair democratic elections: dictatorship from one majority camp to another that does not reach that majority.

The revolution of 1789, in the name of its ideas and ideals, was thus unable to find in the history of France and the reading of its cathedrals, the rules indispensable to the peace and prosperity of the citizens. We know what Napoleon Bonaparte had in store for him to finally get out of these terrible years: the empire, to align itself with the British, German, Austro-Hungarian, Russian empires… We are still within this frame of reference and this belief in the utility of power over the widest possible geographical area. In Europe and especially in developing countries.

Advances in transport and communications have made it possible to govern from a central point of view ever-larger areas and ever-larger populations, in order to achieve this the political leaders had to legitimize their desire for power through the new democracy and by rejecting the functioning of the republic.

In the United States, independence has enabled the various religious or national communities that have left the European continent to finally live in peace and prosper according to the rules they have chosen for themselves. These rules were of a cultural nature, often given by a founding member with religious ideas or by merchant families seeking to make a fortune in this new Eldorado. In France in 1790, there was much more debate among revolutionaries about whether power should be vested in the people or whether political leaders should beware of the people and establish a parliamentary system capable of ensuring the prosperity of the ruling elite

The notion of state supplants those of Republic and Democracy

To mask these conflicts of interest between leaders and citizens, the notion of the state was born, not to use the notions of republic and democracy anymore.

The state is larger than the republic, and it represents an empty shell that leaders can fill according to the political regime that at some point suits them best to ensure their businesses’ success.

In fact, the state is a composite of citizens and their leaders, who are no longer necessarily monarchies, but also social minorities, especially wealthy ones. The state justifies the presence of a group of leaders separate from the group of citizens. The essential function associated with the concept of state is the control of a population so that it follows the directives of the minority which directs the power system.

The state only exists in the language of power systems. In life networks organizations, this notion is not used. There is no state in them.

However, this distinction does not exist in a republic that operates on the basis of citizens’ assemblies that decide on optimal solutions and their adaptation to local particularities. The state is a legally vague concept that corresponds more to a socio-political reality that leaders want to legitimize. Within the framework of the state, democracy develops under the leadership of the ruling minority and its endemic manipulations of public opinion.

The confusion between Republic and Democracy

The confusion between republic and democracy quickly became established for a simple reason: either the bankers who financed the conflicts imposed their interests in a timely manner, as occurred at the time of American independence, with the notorious example of the political conflict over monetary creation between Jefferson and Hamilton, or the revolutionaries ignored the rules of operation of a republic and a direct, participatory republic.

This has been the case in France since those rules were eliminated after 1307 by royal absolutism.

Democracy enabled political parties, which are mostly bankers, to advance their particular interests. For bankers, all they had to do was trade their dominance over monarchs for that over political parties.

To manipulate citizens, the use of political parties proved even easier.

Indeed, financiers had to resort to World War I to eliminate the last recalcitrant emperors: the German emperor and especially the tsar of Russia then in the Second World War to try to seize the wealth of Russia after having financed the takeover of the German National Socialist Party except that they also had to eliminate Nazism because the German economic miracle had been financed with Schacht by a creation of sovereign currency indexed to the work of the German people and not by borrowing from Anglo-Saxon bankers, casus belli major much worse than the Soviet communist utopia.

States organized into political democracies perform poorly in serving the common interest of a social group. Elections allow one side to govern according to its ideas and interests, and the law of the simple majority corresponds to a real electoral dictatorship from one side to the other.

Thus, political parties currently gathering in France less than 2% of the population always have the claim to want to govern the country while their members and leaders are at best ignorant of the republican rules guaranteeing the prosperity of all, or at worst of the elites who refuse to understand and apply them to preserve their power and their wealth.

Democracy then corresponds to a manipulation of public opinion

Democracy is the manipulation of public opinion through political squabbles that are inappropriate and damaging to a country. This manipulation comes to a head when a Republican Party is guilty of the sham of naming itself this way, while it is true to have one rule, the rule of private ownership of the means of production that allows unlimited enrichment, while this rule is completely contrary to Republican rules.

This imposture was set up in the United States, it was necessary for the party of the French right in despair to also commit this imposture contrary to all our republican history, a successful history of the time of the cathedrals before 1307, a history so tortuous and lost in the democratic affair since 1790 but which does not excuse this last scandalous imposture.

In 2016, we don’t want to accept anything from these sellers. Our politicians of all stripes want to sell us more and more populist and soliciting democratic ideas to justify and maintain their place in this liberal system of power. What they want to sell us, in reality, are pretexts to deny the alternative of the republic, the alternative of organizations in citizen life networks.

No, we say assertively NO

and we reject these politicians, the principal players who are working to establish a bankers-led world government and who are following to the letter the demands of the United States Bankers Association, demands which are still present and increasingly imposed with a brazenness equal to the height of their most despicable and criminal greed. 

Return the Republic and its operating rules.

To escape the current financial crisis and finally defeat our finance enemies, we must eliminate the notion of democracy – a false and unnecessary notion in order to return to the functioning of the republic and its rules that guarantee prosperity for all.

Use a full currency again (or a positive monney).

The restoration of citizen power over monetary creation through the full sovereig currency (positive monney) is thus the first step towards the return of the republic.

This fundamental debate and major Republican achievement means that the political sham that presents citizens in our current democracies with a Republican side that uses the word republic to impose its private interests and the liberal doctrine designed to serve them will stop. This alignment of political parties with liberal doctrine is in the spirit of our democracies. Aside from extremist parties seeking populist solutions by seizing power in the current system, parties of both the left and the right are more interested in promoting partisan political ideas than in building the rules of political, economic, and social functioning in a republic that serves the interests of all citizens.

The Age of Enlightenment, Voltaire and Rousseau, did indeed express democratic ideas to fight royal absolutism. It must be noted that they did not know or did not know how to find the rules of operation of the free medieval cities, the city states of Antiquity or northern Italy of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Gavroche during the June 1832 revolution sang that the absence of a republic was the fault of Voltaire and Rousseau.

Erik Reinert in his book: “How rich countries became rich Why poor countries remain poor” clearly showed how the King of England, to become rich in turn, used the economic mode of operation of the cities states of northern Italy (the city of Venice, Florence, Genoa…). Then the other monarchies used the control structure called “State”.

We have defined the values ​​of humanist society, this text now poses the course to follow in terms of the rules that concretize these values. To put an end to the power of Anglo-Saxon world finance, the first step, the urgency is to restore citizen power on the creation of money by adopting full sovereign currency (positive Monney, Smart currency …).

Currency is only a means. This means has enabled a few international bankers to associate themselves to dominate the economy and the states and the aim of this Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy is the establishment of a world government to the richest services. The full currency eliminates these international bankers and this Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy.

Practice subsidiarity and participatory local direct democracy

It is then a question of taking up our history where our elders had to leave their republics, European free cities with respect to monarchies and placed under the governance and protection of knights orders, essentially the order of the Templars, when the European monarchies extended their colonial system and then when the capitalist system imposed its world government in the service of plutocracy, the richest government.

The historical and known examples of the use of subsidiarity to obtain the optimal solution can be seen above all, on the one hand on the Gizeh plateau on the edge of the Nile with the different pyramids built until the form is obtained and The best plans in the Great Pyramid, and on the other hand through the example of the construction of cathedrals in Europe.

Few books explain the last network organization of Europe in the time of cathedrals before Friday October 13, 1307 which destroyed it in France on the orders of the king associated with the pope which he had made named in Rome (the former archbishop from Bordeaux). The municipal archives and those of the abbeys having been destroyed for the most part in 1789 in France, those which survived are under the thumb of the taboos and prohibitions of the leaders of our current civil and theocratic power systems.

In our neighboring countries, particularly Switzerland where war destruction is absent, the archives linked to the foundation in August 1307 of the Confederation of free Swiss cantons and older those describing the foundation and the development of abbeys (like Einsiedeln developed by monks from Alsace and which served as a basis for the future major city of Zurich) can show how this common management of common goods was organized before their more or less generalized privatization when the nobles became owners of the municipal goods then during the development of ‘Liberal economy.

In Alsace, two books show this functioning, certainly after 1307: La Décapole, ten cities of Alsace Allied for their freedoms 1354 – 1679 and Belfort 1307-2007, seven centuries of courage and freedom.

Yet subsidiarity is still present in the current debate. We have shown it in our chapter on the total quality approach in French industrial companies between 1980 and 1990.

Between 1985 and 1990, in our industrial companies, our methods of solving cause and goal problems, quality circles, the implementation of total quality to obtain the ISO 9001 or 9002 certifications were a successful practical example Ascending and descending subsidiarity. In France, in industry, non -quality increased from 3,000 billion francs to 1,000 billion francs between 1980 and the late 1980s, a reduction of 2/3.

The rejection of subsidiarity is maintained for the market to become the new foundation of the company. The Republic managed directly by citizens being no longer adapted to develop the markets, the leaders of the liberal economy have used the new notion of democracy used by philosophers in the Age of Enlightenment to challenge royal absolutism. It is therefore through our political action to ban what is allowed and to allow again what has been prohibited. A lawyer knows how to do and knows how to direct this change of paradigm and political regime. It is the main mission of a social group that takes power: select in the body to know what is good for the interests it wants to satisfy and what it prohibits to defend them.

The differences between democracy and republic can be summarized in the following table:

Differences between the liberal capitalist system of power and citizen networks of life

	power systems: CAPITALISME	citizen network organizations
values	Exchange value only The rarity	The value of exchange and use The abundance.
Rules	the market Prioritizing economics over politics and thus prohibiting subsidiarity. use of money debt in the financial market, in the real economy and the fictitious economy based on stock market price speculation.	subsidiarity and alliance of opposites. Politics priority on the economy, Humanist values ​​are at the heart of the life project in society. use of full sovereign currency (positive monney) in trade.
political regime	democracy It is subject to the interests of economic and financial leaders. Dictatorship from one party to another according to electoral results: the losers often have no decision-making power.	republic It serves the interests of all citizens. It is universal through the optimal and sovereign solution when this optimal solution is adapted to local particularities by social groups where they live.
human activity	Limited to essential work organized to maximize the profits of owners of the means of production, The realization of works and political action are prohibited.	Complementarity between the work essential to life and survival, the realization of works that raise the standard of living and are passed on to future generations, the political action that applies subsidiarity and the alliance of opposites at local and confederal level.
decision-making	Electoral system: Vote on proposals by political parties to elect citizens’ representatives and their electoral program. Decisions taken solely by representatives, subjection of citizens to rules drawn up by Parliament. Citizens can demonstrate their disagreement only in new elections, provided they obtain a majority. No citizen participation in decision-making outside elections.	Management, Communication and Management Problem Solving Process: Designation of the delegates participating in the committee which will determine the optimal solution, if necessary drawing lots from a group of experts of equal level of competence
property right	Sacralization of the right of individual property, elimination of common property, limitation of collective property recognized by the state.	Complementarity between individual, common and group-managed property rights, collective and managed by group delegates
knowledge source	Theocracies in power systems impose their dogmas by prohibiting the source of spiritual knowledge. The system of political and economic power imposes a separation between the state and the theocratic system, otherwise it uses theocracy to strengthen political power.	Complementarity between the individual and initiatory source, spirituality, and the intellectual and rational collective source of knowledge to develop a global knowledge capable of marrying the different human cultures born of local, environmental particularities.

Release citizens from their ignorance in politics.

So we have three areas of knowledge to work on in order to get people out of their ignorance or lack of it:

1. the management of a full currency (positive monney) instead of debt money and the submission to perpetual indebtedness that allows bankers to enrich themselves without limit and without paying taxes on their production of money created from nothing.
2. the management of subsidiarity, which is based on methods of solving problems of cause and purpose, methods used at the level of the whole of human activity in citizen networks of life. promoting the functioning of citizen life networks. For example, to show that the notion of the market used by capitalist and liberal doctrine is to be abandoned because it forbids us two elementary levels of human activity. Human activity develops on three levels : the work essential to life and survival, the realization of works which raise the standard of living and are passed on to future generations and whose financing eliminates the inflationary risks contained in the functioning of capitalism,
3. And third level, political action precisely through subsidiarity and the alliance of opposites. Liberal doctrine deletes the last two levels and condemns citizens to the economic horror written by Hannah Arendt: submission to work as deemed useful or not by capitalist rulers. Another example: learn to use the complementarity between our two sources of knowledge: the individual spiritual initiatory source and the collective intellectual and rational source.

This work of formation is based on the use of the old examples before and after 1307 but this knowledge is also current even if it was mainly used in companies when the power was in the hands of the employees and not as since, at the service of the dictatorship of the shareholders. The gateways to this knowledge are therefore multiple and accessible. This improvement in citizen skills is indispensable to achieving the goal of free citizens in free republics, free from the domination of the leaders of the current systems of power. The Internet is a major contributor to this new humanist and republican collective intelligence… and fileane.com as well.

The use of subsidiarity and the alliance of opposites is a principle of universal and equitable functioning of social groups.

This break and paradigm shift has radical and fundamental consequences. We are not looking for an ideal republic but, and the reader, the reader of fileane.com understood this since at least 2002 and the putting online of this website, we are leading the approach of the lawyer who knows the positive law and the rules used on the one hand, but also on the other hand the rules prohibited by the current systems of power.

The lawyer knows that knowledge of the rules used and of the prohibited rules is indispensable for those who want to find a way out of the current crises and especially to eliminate the power of the bankers and their world government.

It is no longer a question of teaching future citizens that the mode of social influence is autocracy and submission freely consented. It is a question of teaching our youth how to develop counterpowers and how to establish active minorities capable of responding to the call of the Republic.

The Republic calls us! This is the political watchword. We have found the optimal functioning of a social group to again develop a flourishing humanist society.

The republic is calling! That was the political order of the day in 2016, when we regained the optimal functioning of a social group to once again develop a flourishing humanist society.

The republic is calling us!

Hay from all the political discussions to defend partisan interests, the flawed theory of wealth runoff, the claim to want to compete with low-wage countries by eliminating our social protection, by impoverishing the workers forced to pay more and more private and public debts while working more and being paid less, by ruining the pensioners and leaving the young unemployed without even daring to mention the fundamental question of the remuneration of work with a full currency.

Enough privatization and sales of public goods to repay the state’s debt when it comes to financing the economy as before 1973.

Europe of the Republics instead of Europe of the liberal market in the hands of the masters of global finance.

The Republic calls us! To answer this call, the Republic has won through the will of the people and with audacity, the only one capable of bringing new spaces of freedom compared to the despotism of power systems.

The republic is calling!

Since November 2018 and the Jaunnes vests crisis, the general states, this call from the Republic is more pressing and determined to abandon this liberal system, its American-style electoral system where the elected candidate is certainly the one who obtained The highest campaign budget on the part of banks, multinationals and its activists.

the republic is calling!

Other elements for determining the policy group of sold:

“Let me decide and control the regulation of a nation’s money supply, and I don’t care what makes laws.”

Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Bankers Dynasty of the same name.

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our freedoms than a standing army. He who controls the money of the nation controls the nation.”

Thomas Jefferson.

“I fear that foreign bankers will completely dominate America’s abundant wealth … they will not hesitate to precipitate Christian states into wars and chaos, in order to become heirs to the whole earth”

Otto von Bismark, Chancellor of Prussia, following the assassination of Lincoln.

“If the people of this nation understood our banking and monetary system, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

Henry Ford

“If the orgies of speculation are allowed to spread, the crisis that will come will clearly not only affect the speculators themselves, but will take the whole country into a general depression.”

Paul Warburg, March 1929.

“The crash of 1929 was not accidental. It’s a carefully planned event. The international bankers have sought to create a desperate condition here, so that they may become our masters at all.”

Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, 1933

“We will have a world government, whether we like it or not. It remains to be seen whether the world government will be established by consent or conquest.”

James Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, at the United States Council on International Relations.

“Capitalism is for children whose insatiability, the desire to consume without rest go hand in hand with the negation of death. That’s why he’s morbid. The mad desire for money, which is merely a desire to lengthen time, is childish and harmful. It makes us forget the true desire, the only adorable desire, the desire for love. “

B. Maris – Houellebecq economist.

“Perfect dictatorship would have the appearance of democracy, a prison without walls from which prisoners would not think to escape. A system of slavery where through consumption and entertainment, slaves would have the love of their servitude”

Aldous Huxley.

“After 1981, I asked François Mitterrand: – why now that you have the power, don’t you do what you promised?

He replied that he did not have the power to confront the World Bank, capitalism, neoliberalism. That he won a government but not power.

I learned that being the government, being the president, is of little use in these subject societies, subject to capitalism. I had the experience directly for 14 years.

In France, we elect, and the elected make laws that they never proposed and that we never wanted.

Is France a democracy? A world power? I say this as a Frenchwoman: it means nothing.

Danielle Mitterrand.

Let us also remember the words of Michel Rocard in an interview with Laurent Delahousse shortly before his death. In the case of François Hollande, he said that the words “my enemies is finance” may have been an uncontrolled flight of the candidate but that once President, he had to take into account the fact that he had to finance his government program and thus address the bankers. Obviously, the idea and the optimal solution of full sovereign currency were either discarded or worse, completely ignored by Michel Rocard.

It is true that this fundamental subject is not part of the academic teaching of economics and political and social sciences in our country. The “good students” are completely ignorant of this, and especially the elites, especially politicians.

The quotes that we have just presented show that at the “ignorant democrats”, these personalities who express their resentment in relation to capitalism and the representative democratic system led by the masters of the world’s capitalist and liberal world government, found courage, Or even the audacity to show a space of freedom found when the citizens are heading themselves as a republics.

In April 2022, the sold people want to sell us

• Their pandemic vaccines when they financed the research laboratories to find a coronavirus transmissible to humans.

For more than ten years, these organizations and companies which have specialized in the study of viruses and other coronaviruses (as well as all the people who revolve within them), such as “Eco Health Alliance” and Peter Daszak, Nih and Anthony Fauci , “Metabiota” and Nathan Daniel Wolfe, Labyrinth Global Health and its leaders and founders, worked to set up and organize organic weapons laboratories in Ukraine on behalf and with funds from the “U.S. Department of Defense “(” Defense department of the United States “).

In April 2022, we no longer know if this virus comes from Wuhan or “Biolabs” (biological weapons laboratories) in Ukraine. For the moment they prefer to sell us Wuhan than Ukraine. The pangolin seems to have been removed from the display.

• The threat of the extreme right to elect Macron again in the second round of the presidential election in France. It’s the second time since 2017 and it’s not about to stop …

• War with all its crimes and horrors since Ukraine is Europe and tomorrow the European Union and … NATO.

• Inflation and perhaps hyper inflation to ruin the middle classes more quickly which, for them, are a threat of counterweight.

• The gas and oil of American shale and the Russian gas and oil embargo, embargo that during the Cold War they had failed to set up.

• The end of states since indeed their world government manages to control everything and the structure of national states has become useless and expensive in public money. Which is a significant shortfall for shareholders and rentiers, bankers, financiers … triumphant neo liberalism.

Be an accomplice

Our reader understood. We are not trying to sell him from the Republic against democracy, still months of being an accomplice or a sold, but we offer him a choice of civilization.