The European Constitution and our abandonment of 1790

 

Subsidiary question with European dimension, euh... not, revolutionist !

 

 The French position in front of adhesion with the European constitution, beyond questions of politicking tactic secondary, embarrasses the partisans of the republic resulting from the revolution of 1789, which they are of left like line. The origin of this embarrassment lies in the principle of subsidiarity.

 This principle hardly raises difficulty of comprehension : the recourse to a hierarchically higher organization should take place only when the organizations do not manage to solve a litigation or when a question relates to all the organizations of the same level and that it is to better treat this question at the higher hierarchical level in a common way rather than to let each organization solve with its manner this situation with all the risks of conflicts or bad interpretation, of more or less relevant solutions that this involves. This principle rests on good direction, pragmatism, effectiveness to arrive at peace and progress in these organizations. There is not the French problem.

 Still it is necessary that there are organizations of the same level and higher hierarchical organizations of level. At the top of the system of republican capacity, there is the state, the nation resulting from 1789. But then for us French the situation becomes complicated : the revolution of 1789 made the vacuum between the state and the citizens. All the intermediate organizations were prohibited, mainly in 1790 by the law the Hatter. How then to adopt a principle of subsidiarity in France ? As a preliminary, we must give up the philosophical, ideological base of 1789 and the political loans with the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau who to defend the personal freedom carrying out ineluctably to the public property, removes all the intermediate bodies of the company and grants at the secondary state only one role.

 Europe, its constitution which rests on this principle of subsidiarity, are thus not a threat for the sovereignty of the French nation. The question is well more this one : how is it done that the nation could as many monopolize centralized capacities, could remove the role of the basic social organizations at the point to make impossible the recourse to this subsidiarity, mechanism basic in an organization based on a confederal step which respects each basic organization while seeking synergies through alliances, unions between them ? And this of course with thousand places of the ideas of Rousseau ? Europe is thus a real opportunity for us French to correct the errors of 1789 and to put an end to this historical devolution of the royal absolutism in the republic, the centralism of the system of being able changing only name.

 Then the questions of employment, the social policies will be considered differently in our country that while waiting for the decisions of a President of the Republic compared to a ratification of a constitutional treaty!

 An organization in network (as we develop it on www.fileane.com ) rests on the principle of subsidiarity and even the Roman church remains faithful to this principle even if since the Council of Nicée it prohibits the networks of communities like were the first Christian communities " the Great Law which Lie " of the people iroquois which was used as a basis of work Benjamin Franklin, to Thomas Jefferson and to John Adams to write in 1776 the Declaration of Independence of the United States then in 1787 the American Constitution, is based on a policy, economic and social development of this principle of subsidiarity. When Marx and Engels, in their turn studied this Indian confederal constitution, they could take again the words of C Colden which in 1727 wrote : " as regards political and social organization, Iroquois exceeded the Romans ". Engels will discover the organization of a company which does not know the state yet, the state which supposes a separate particular capacity of the whole of the citizens who make it up. In this confederation iroquoise since the years 1300, all are equal, including the women and lived in peace before the arrival of the European colonists!

 Then to pass why here from the European businesses to the Indian businesses iroquoises ? Because if this confederal constitution of the Great Law which Lie of the " people which build " is always existing, all to prove as well today as it comes from the same Irish monastic movements and Benedictines who on our premises, in Europe, developed an organization in network identical starting from the knowledge saved since the temples of ancient Egypt, in particular of the temple of Dendérah guard of the divine Laws and celestial mathematics. Except that in Europe, it could not remove the systems of being able of king de France and the pope of Rome who ended up joining to betray this movement and to destroy it in 1307, one Friday October 13, the Bible not supporting the contradiction of the knowledge of Dendérah. The history is discovered and clarified the last errors. The state will never replace the creativity, the heat, the motivation and the spirit to undertake basic organizations of a company to work or living its loves in families, communities being combined between them to pursue their social goals. The state cannot replace itself the civil company unless to overcome it and make it passive under its autocracy. It would be time for us French to take again in hands our revolution to complete it, probably according to ideas' of Rousseau since its good savage, that about which it had intended to speak Montesquieu just like, Voltaire, Locke, Hobbes, was indeed iroquois or of the people haudenosaunee. Far from being a foreigner of the New World, this Indian, politically, was the brother of the knights and the French monks and Europeans who were burned on roughing-hew them Enquiry or of king de France, these cursed kings !

 Far from cursing the European Constitution and its principle of contrary subsidiarity to the centralizing bases of the 5th French Republic, let us complete our French revolution and restore an organization in network. Let us leave our systems of civil and religious capacities ! Then we will propose another European constitution worthy of the civilizing and humanistic thought which lived a few centuries on our ground, which was destroyed there just like in Central America and of the South by the conquistadores with the pay of the papacy, which always remains on less scale on the edges of the St. Lawrence, near of Acadie. By doing this, we unearth any hatchet neither do not poke any passion source of conflicts ethnic or religious, we bring an ember to light fire and we will find well among us some people to whom we will entrust the maintenance and the monitoring of the fire of the Council of the 25 or 30 Nations of Europe or better, from the 50 to 60 people and social organizations, orders knights, federations of associations of Europe... it is neither wizard nor Sioux ! but at least Iroquois, if not Benedictine, templier, knight, in short for people without fear and reproaches, with courage and the faith in the human being intact... oh ! a current French poet can also put himself in the steps of these elder on the way of life and join the people which build spaces of political life, economic and social local, French, European, world and this, you included/understood it, according to this good old man principle of subsidiarity !

 

english home     library      home